ArticleScientific reports2025
Validation of the gender, age, physiology model and other prognostic factors in interstitial lung disease patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases-interstitial lung disease (SARD-ILD) exhibit diverse clinical courses, highlighting the importance of prognostic prediction for effective management. This study aimed to validate the gender-age-physiology (GAP) model in patients with SARD-ILD and identify additional prognostic factors. Clinical data of patients diagnosed with SARD-ILD at a tertiary center in South Korea were retrospectively analyzed. Using variables from the GAP model, along with exercise capacity, chest computed tomography (CT) patterns, and clinical course factors such as progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF), multivariate and survival analyses were performed to evaluate prognostic factors for 3-year mortality. Among 142 patients with SARD-ILD, 27 died and one underwent lung transplantation over a median follow-up period of 32.8 months. In the multivariate analysis, higher GAP stages, the combination of radiologic usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) patterns and exertional hypoxia during the 6-min walk test (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.506, P = 0.049), and PPF (HR 3.481, P = 0.001) were independently associated with 3-year mortality. Additionally, among patients in advanced GAP groups (GAP stage II or III, n = 45), those with both exertional hypoxia and a UIP pattern had significantly worse prognosis (median survival: 18.0 vs. 31.2 months, P = 0.042). Additional prognostic factors beyond the GAP model were identified, including exercise capacity, CT imaging patterns, and clinical course. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating multiple prognostic indicators for improved stratification and management of patients with SARD-ILD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.