ArticleScientific reports2025
Basal-like subtype of esophageal adenocarcinoma and it's morphological, molecular and clinical characteristics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and squamous cell carcinoma are the two main tumor types of the esophagus, each with distinct morphological and molecular features. While mixed adeno-squamous carcinomas are recognized, it remains unclear whether a basal-like subtype-known from breast and pancreatic adenocarcinomas-also exists in EAC. This study analyzed tumor samples from 953 patients with operable EAC for expression of the basal cytokeratins CK5 and CK6. Tumors with any squamous differentiation were excluded. A small subset (3.4%) showed a basal-like phenotype, characterized by high CK5 and/or CK6 expression and small-luminal tubular growth. High CK5 expression was associated with significantly worse overall survival, and within the neoadjuvantly treated subgroup, it emerged as an independent negative prognostic marker. Tumors with concurrent high CK5 and CK6 expression also showed reduced survival. Exploratory analyses revealed potential associations between CK6 expression and Claudin18.2 status, and between CK5 expression and Y-chromosome loss. These findings indicate the presence of a distinct basal-like subtype within EAC, linked to poor prognosis and possible molecular differences. CK5, alone or in combination with CK6, may serve as a practical biomarker for identifying this subtype and could support the development of more personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.