Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40634382›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The dual impact of tobacco spending: crowding out essentials and crowding in addictive behaviors.

Elvina Merkaj, Drini Imami, Jeffrey Drope

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elvina MerkajPolytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy. e.merkaj@univpm.it.
Drini ImamiAgriculture University of Tirana, Tirana, Albania. dimami@ubt.edu.al.
Jeffrey DropeEconomics for Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA. jdrope@jhu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tobacco use, a major preventable risk factor for premature death and morbidity, profoundly shapes individual and household decision-making. Tobacco spending in lower-income economies exacerbates economic strain of the households. To accommodate tobacco costs, many households are forced to reduce essential expenditures on health and education-a phenomenon known as the crowding out effect. This study uses data from Albania's national Household Budget Survey and applies a three-stage least squares method with instrumental variables to estimate Engel curves to shed light on how tobacco use influences household financial decisions. The findings reveal that tobacco spending significantly reduces expenditures on essential needs such as health, education, housing, and clothing. Additionally, tobacco use shows a positive correlation with alcohol spending, revealing another negative influence of an addictive behavior on household resource allocation. The results emphasize the urgent need for stronger tobacco control measures promote better economic decision-making within households. Such measures would enhance public health, improve economic stability, and encourage more equitable resource distribution.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveHealth ExpendituresTobacco UseAdultFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAlbaniaCrowding out effectTobacco spending

Identifiers

PMID40634382
PMCPMC12241404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.