ArticleScientific reports2025
Knowledge about the health impact of climate change and associated factors among women in Northeastern Ethiopia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, climate change (CC) is a major challenge to the health and lives of people especially in developing countries like Ethiopia. CC is an issue of great importance for public health and socioeconomic equity due to its diverse consequences. In developing nations, women still make up approximately half of the agricultural labor force. SDGs 13 and 5 would be achieved and CC mitigation efforts would rise if more women took part in it. Women should therefore be adequately informed about mitigating measures. However, there is no study regarding the issue among women. Therefore, this study attempted to fill this gap. A cross-sectional study was conducted from June 1 to 30, 2024 among systematically selected 401 women in Northeastern Ethiopia. Binary logistic regression models at 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to determine the factors affecting the knowledge about the health impacts of CC. From the bi-variable analysis, variables having a P-value < 0.25 were retained into the multivariable analysis. In multivariable analysis, variables with a p-value of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Of the total women, 47.4% were between 18 and 30 years, with a mean age of 31 years. This study uses the mean to determine participants knowledge level; those who score the mean or higher are seen as having good knowledge, while those who score below the mean were regarded as having poor knowledge. In the research area, women had good knowledge prevalence about the health impact of CC at 34.4% (95% CI: 29.7-39.4). This research revealed that higher educational level (AOR = 3.46, 95%CI = 1.75-6.85) and using TV/radio as source of information (AOR = 2, 95%CI = 1.24-3.24) were significantly correlated with having good knowledge about the health impact of CC. In the current study, women's good knowledge about the health impact of CC was very low. This implies the need to support the women through intensive and continuous health information through radio and television.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.