ArticleScientific reports2025
Developing machine learning frameworks to predict mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete mixed with various industrial byproducts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intelligent low carbon reinforced concrete beam design optimization via deep reinforcement learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research investigates the predictive modeling of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) incorporating industrial byproducts, focusing on compressive strength (Fc), flexural strength (Ff), workability (Slump), and porosity. Various machine learning models, including Kstar, M5Rules, ElasticNet, XNV, and Decision Table (DT), were evaluated to determine the most accurate predictions for each property. The findings indicate that Kstar outperformed other models across all categories, demonstrating the highest accuracy and lowest errors in predicting Fc, Ff, Slump, and Porosity. Sensitivity analyses using SHAP and Hoffman & Gardener's methods identified the most influential parameters affecting each UHPC property, providing insights into the key factors driving concrete performance. The research highlights the sustainable impact of incorporating industrial byproducts, reducing environmental footprints while maintaining superior mechanical and durability properties. The developed models offer practical guidance for optimizing UHPC formulations, promoting sustainability in the construction industry by enabling efficient material utilization and reducing reliance on conventional cement-based components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.