Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Xin Li *Department of Chemistry and the Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 999077, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8474-6330
Wenlang Li *Department of Chemistry and the Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 999077, China.
Ziqi DengDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, 999077, China.
Jingtian WangState Key Laboratory of Superhard Materials, College of Physics, Jilin University, Changchun, 130012, China.
Shan HeDepartment of Chemistry and the Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 999077, China.
Xinwen OuDepartment of Chemistry and the Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 999077, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6694-7932
Ryan T K KwokDepartment of Chemistry and the Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 999077, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6866-3877
Jianwei SunDepartment of Chemistry and the Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 999077, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2470-1077
Jacky W Y LamDepartment of Chemistry and the Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 999077, China. chjacky@ust.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5754-1703
Zhihong GuoDepartment of Chemistry and the Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 999077, China. chguo@ust.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0374-8412
Ben Zhong TangDepartment of Chemistry and the Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 999077, China. tangbenz@cuhk.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0293-964X
Funding
Innovation and Technology Commission (ITF) ITC-CNERC14SC01Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) 16303221Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) C6014-20W
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Achieving long-lived room temperature phosphorescence (RTP) in organic materials has garnered significant attention in the field of optoelectronics. Although many host-guest systems with versatile performances have been developed, their photophysical mechanisms remain unclear due to the complicated intermolecular interactions and multiple energy transfer pathways, leading to unavoidable trial-and-error in molecular designs. Here we reveal that the dynamic coupling process in the excited state is crucial for inducing phosphorescence, where host and guest molecules firstly couple to enhance the intersystem crossing efficiency, and then decouple to transfer excitons to the triplet state of guest. Such a process shows universal applicability and tunable performance, with the longest lifetime for red RTP (τ
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Building bridges through dynamic coupling for organic phosphorescence. · full record | OpenQuestion