ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-based identification of key factors and spatial heterogeneity analysis of urban flooding: a case study of the central urban area of Ordos.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-scale buffer analysis and explainable machine learning identify urban form factors and thresholds for waterlogging in Shenzhen urban villages during 9·7 rainstorm.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning framework for urban flood susceptibility assessment: a multi-model comparison with spatial heterogeneity analysis in Yancheng.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With global climate change and accelerating urbanization, urban flood is becoming more frequent worldwide. Understanding the urban vulnerability is crucial for making decisions on urban flood control. This study uses urban flood susceptibility (UFS) as an indicator, and comprehensively applies three machine learning models, XGBoost, CatBoost and LightGBM, in the Kangyi area of Ordos City. Combined with the Shapley Additive explanations method, the driving mechanism and spatial heterogeneity of flood susceptibility was explored in the study area. The results show: (1) Model performance comparison: All three models have high accuracy, with XGBoost performing well in overall classification (OA = 0.96) and CatBoost performing well in distinguishing flood/non-flood samples (AUC = 0.85). (2) Multi-model adaptability assessment: The proposed "model-factor-space" framework highlights the sensitivity of XGBoost to urbanization indicators, the ability of CatBoost to capture naturalgeographical elements, and the efficiency of LightGBM in analyzing terrain thresholds. (3) Dynamic thresholds and synergies: Impervious surface density (ISD) is the most critical factor, and when ISD > 0.2, the risk of flooding will continue to increase by 60%. Comprehensive analysis with spatial heterogeneity shows that high-risk areas are mainly affected by ISD, road density (> 10,000 m/km2) and low altitude (< 1300m) in urban built-up areas, while low-to-medium risk areas are sensitive to vegetation coverage (> 7,000) and Dis2Water bodies (> 1,500m). (4) Hierarchical governance strategy: A three-level spatial governance strategy is proposed: in the core area, priority is given to ISD control (< 0.2) and pipe network upgrades; in the transitional area, slope interception and ecological restoration are combined; and in the potential risk area, a multi-scale monitoring and early warning system is established for multi-scale monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.