ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrating deep learning in stride-to-stride muscle activity estimation of young and old adults with wearable inertial measurement units.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning has become powerful and yet versatile tool that allows for the extraction of complex patterns from rich datasets. One field that can benefits from this advancement is human gait analysis. Conventional gait analysis requires a specialized laboratory setup with markers positioned at anatomical landmarks. It also demands accurate muscle identification and electrode placement. This work overcomes these limitations by proposing a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) that processes tokenized data measured by the wearable Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) to estimate muscle activities during walking. Gait data were gathered from 65 participants aged 19-73 years old. The proposed method was compared against the other deep learning models. The result of the proposed method was better that the alternatives. The results demonstrated that test dataset achieved Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) less than 12% and Correlation Coefficient (r) greater than 90% for all muscles. It performed particularly well on unseen data, with most muscle activities showing RMSE below 20% and r above 80%. These findings indicate that the proposed technique can efficiently extract relevant gait data and estimate the muscle activity, potentially simplifying gait analysis and making it more affordable and accessible to a wider range of users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.