Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40634324›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A hybrid architecture for enhancing Chinese text processing using CNN and LLaMA2.

Xize Liu, Yiyi Wang, Nana Niu, Bingyan Zhang, Jingsheng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xize LiuSub-institute of Standards Information, China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yiyi WangSub-institute of Standards Information, China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing, 100191, China.
Nana NiuSub-institute of Standards Information, China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing, 100191, China. niunn@cnis.ac.cn.
Bingyan ZhangSub-institute of Standards Information, China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing, 100191, China.
Jingsheng LiSub-institute of Standards Information, China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing, 100191, China.

Funding

The Fundamental Research Funds 292024Y-11794The National Key R&D Program 2022YFF0608000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving field of natural language processing (NLP), the processing of the Chinese language, with its unique complexities, presents significant challenges, especially in the context of Large Language Models (LLMs) like LLaMA2. These challenges are further exacerbated by the presence of non-standardized text prevalent across digital Chinese content. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a novel hybrid approach that seamlessly integrates deep contextual embeddings with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to enhance the processing of standardized Chinese text. The proposed approach involves a multi-stage process wherein deep contextual embeddings are first utilized to capture the nuanced semantic relationships within text. Second, CNNs are employed to identify and exploit structural and syntactic patterns, facilitating a comprehensive understanding of the text. Finally, the proposed hybrid model significantly improves LLaMA2's efficiency and accuracy across various Chinese text processing tasks by ensuring that both semantic depth and structural nuances are accurately captured. The effectiveness of the proposed model is demonstrated through rigorous testing across several benchmarks, showcasing its superiority in processing Chinese text with enhanced accuracy and speed. This research not only contributes to the advancement of text processing capabilities of LLMs but also opens new avenues for their application in tasks such as automated translation and sentiment analysis.

Identifiers

PMID40634324
PMCPMC12241548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.