Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40634304›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Computational models reveal that intuitive physics underlies visual processing of soft objects.

Wenyan Bi, Aalap D Shah, Kimberly W Wong, Brian J Scholl, Ilker Yildirim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wenyan BiDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. wenyan.bi@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7522-9235
Aalap D ShahDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Kimberly W WongDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9006-1592
Brian J SchollDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ilker YildirimDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. ilker.yildirim@yale.edu.

Funding

United States Department of Defense | United States Air Force | AFMC | Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AF Office of Scientific Research) #FA9550-22-1-0041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational explorations of human cognition have been especially successful when applied to visual perception. Existing models have primarily focused on rigid objects, emphasizing shape-preserving invariance to changes in viewpoint, lighting, object size, and scene context. Yet many objects in our everyday environments, such as cloths, are soft. This poses both quantitatively greater and qualitatively different challenges for models of perception, due to soft objects' dynamic and high-dimensional internal structure, as in the changing folds and wrinkles of a cloth waving in the wind. Soft object perception is also correspondingly rich, involving distinct properties such as stiffness. Here we explore the ability of different kinds of computational models to capture visual perception of the physical properties of cloths (e.g., their degrees of stiffness) undergoing different naturalistic transformations (e.g., falling vs. waving in the wind). Across visual matching tasks, both the successes and failures of human performance are well explained by Woven: a new model that incorporates physics-based simulations to infer probabilistic representations of cloths. Woven outperforms powerful, performance-equated alternatives, including its ablations and a deep neural network, and suggests that humanlike machine vision may also require representations that transcend image statistics, and involve intuitive physics.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationVisual PerceptionCognitionHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID40634304
PMCPMC12241314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.