Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40634130›Full record

ArticleEndocrinology, diabetes & metabolism2025

Genetically Predicted Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations in Related to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Jin Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jin YangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Key Lab of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Lab of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0009-6625-6723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn several observational studies, vitamins B6, B9, B12, C and 25-hydroxyvitamin D[25(OH)D] concentrations were associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Although vitamins play a role in the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), their associations remain unclear.

objectiveThis study employed Mendelian randomisation (MR) to explore the causal relationships between circulating concentrations of vitamins B6, B9, B12, C, 25-hydroxyvitamin D and T2DM.

methodsSingle-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) linked to vitamin B6, vitamin B9, vitamin B12, vitamin C and 25(OH)D levels were used as instrumental variables (IVs) in this study. We have two outcomes related to T2DM derived from two genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The first study, referenced by PMID: 3417140, encompasses a cohort of 406,831 individuals of European descent. The second study, identified by PMID: 29892013, includes a sample size of 468,298 Europeans.

resultsBoth univariable Mendelian randomization (UVMR) and multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) analyses demonstrate that genetically predicted elevated levels of serum 25(OH)D are consistently associated with a reduced risk of T2DM. In the UVMR analyses, A 1-SD increase in genetically predicted serum 25(OH)D levels, the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) p = 3.8 × 10

conclusionOur research reveals that higher circulating serum 25(OH)D levels reduce the possibility of T2DM.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Vitamin DFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleMendelian Randomization AnalysisMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide25-hydroxyvitamin DVitamin D25‐hydroxyvitamin Dmultivariable Mendelian randomizationtype 2 diabetes mellitusunivariable Mendelian randomization

Identifiers

PMID40634130
PMCPMC12240638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.