ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025
The Somatosensory Cortex and Body Representation: Updating the Motor System during a Visuoproprioceptive Cue Conflict.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Oscillatory dynamics of motor learning across adulthood life span: a systematic review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The brain's representation of hand position is critical for voluntary movement. Representation is multisensory, combining visual and proprioceptive cues. When these cues conflict, the brain recalibrates its unimodal estimates, shifting them closer together to compensate. Research suggests such updates to body representation are communicated to the motor system to keep hand movements accurate. The neural mechanism is unclear and may depend on how the brain integrates and recalibrates visuoproprioceptive signals: models ranging from hierarchical convergence after unisensory processing to more distributed frameworks have been proposed. We hypothesized that the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) is crucial in this updating process due to its role in proprioception and connections with both primary motor cortex (M1) and multisensory regions of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC). In human participants of both sexes, Experiment 1 showed that short-latency afferent inhibition, a measure of somatosensory-motor integration, changed with proprioceptive recalibration and only in the presence of a cue conflict. This indicates that S1 activity reflects the results of multisensory computations and is inconsistent with a pure hierarchical convergence model of visuoproprioceptive integration. Experiment 2 found that modulating S1, but not M1, with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation increased proprioceptive variance and recalibration. This is consistent with the idea that motor effects of proprioceptive recalibration are mediated by the S1→M1 pathway, although not directly controlled by M1 itself. The specificity of our findings to proprioceptive-not visual-recalibration argues against a fully distributed framework, but our findings support a model of multisensory integration with reciprocal interactions between S1 and PPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.