Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40634125›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

The Somatosensory Cortex and Body Representation: Updating the Motor System during a Visuoproprioceptive Cue Conflict.

Jasmine L Mirdamadi, Reshma Babu, Manasi Wali, Courtney R Seigel, Anna Hsiao, Trevor Lee-Miller, Hannah J Block

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jasmine L MirdamadiDepartment of Kinesiology, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405.ORCID 0000-0001-6438-4451
Reshma BabuDepartment of Kinesiology, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405.
Manasi WaliDepartment of Kinesiology, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405.
Courtney R SeigelDepartment of Kinesiology, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405.
Anna HsiaoDepartment of Kinesiology, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405.
Trevor Lee-MillerDepartment of Kinesiology, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405.
Hannah J BlockDepartment of Kinesiology, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405 hjblock@iu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1561-2718

Funding

Neural basis of sensory and motor learningR01NS112367 · NINDS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI BLOCK, HANNAH JUSTINE · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS112367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain's representation of hand position is critical for voluntary movement. Representation is multisensory, combining visual and proprioceptive cues. When these cues conflict, the brain recalibrates its unimodal estimates, shifting them closer together to compensate. Research suggests such updates to body representation are communicated to the motor system to keep hand movements accurate. The neural mechanism is unclear and may depend on how the brain integrates and recalibrates visuoproprioceptive signals: models ranging from hierarchical convergence after unisensory processing to more distributed frameworks have been proposed. We hypothesized that the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) is crucial in this updating process due to its role in proprioception and connections with both primary motor cortex (M1) and multisensory regions of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC). In human participants of both sexes, Experiment 1 showed that short-latency afferent inhibition, a measure of somatosensory-motor integration, changed with proprioceptive recalibration and only in the presence of a cue conflict. This indicates that S1 activity reflects the results of multisensory computations and is inconsistent with a pure hierarchical convergence model of visuoproprioceptive integration. Experiment 2 found that modulating S1, but not M1, with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation increased proprioceptive variance and recalibration. This is consistent with the idea that motor effects of proprioceptive recalibration are mediated by the S1→M1 pathway, although not directly controlled by M1 itself. The specificity of our findings to proprioceptive-not visual-recalibration argues against a fully distributed framework, but our findings support a model of multisensory integration with reciprocal interactions between S1 and PPC.

Indexed as

Conflict, PsychologicalCuesMotor CortexProprioceptionSomatosensory CortexVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adultbody representationcue conflictmultisensoryproprioceptionrecalibrationsomatosensory cortex

Identifiers

PMID40634125
PMCPMC12330317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.