ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2026
Efficacy of Azacitidine Plus Venetoclax in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Transformed from Myelodysplastic Syndrome after Failure of Azacitidine Monotherapy.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transformed from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) have a poor prognosis, including those treated with azacitidine during the MDS phase; there is no standard for the care of these patients. Recently, azacitidine plus venetoclax (AZA/VEN) was reported to prolong the survival in treatment-naïve AML patients compared with AZA monotherapy. However, the results of AZA/VEN for AML transformed from MDS, particularly after AZA monotherapy, remain unclear. The present study therefore compared the clinical results of AZA/VEN treatment in these patients. Methods Data from MDS patients diagnosed at 10 institutions in Nagasaki Prefecture were collected. Thereafter, patients with transformed AML following AZA monotherapy during the MDS phase were selected, and their treatment response and survival were analyzed. Results The overall response (OR) rate, overall survival (OS), and event-free survival (EFS) were compared among patients treated with AZA/VEN (n=13), chemotherapy (intensive and low-intensity, n=35), AZA monotherapy (mAZA, n=15), and best supportive care (BSC, n=43) after AML transformation. The corresponding OR rates were 38.5%, 20.0%, and 6.7% for the AZA/VEN, chemotherapy, and mAZA groups, respectively (p=0.235). The respective median OS and EFS were 10.7 and 8.9 months for AZA/VEN, 3.2 and 2.0 months for chemotherapy, and 3.8 and 2.7 months for mAZA, and 1.7 months for BSC (OS only) (p=0.000023 for the OS and p=0.026 for the EFS), Conclusion Our findings suggest the superiority of AZA/VEN for AML patients with transformation from MDS following AZA monotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.