ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2026
Student Self-Assessments in Clinical Operative Dentistry: Bridging Perception and Performance.
Article in European journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the reliability and validity of a standardized rubric for staff evaluation of all-ceramic crown preparations at preclinical setting.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Student Peer Assessment in Clinical Operative Dentistry: A Retrospective Study.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Student self-assessment in operative dentistry plays a crucial role in the development of clinical skills and professional competence. This study aimed to investigate the agreement between students' self-assessment and faculty assessment in clinical operative dentistry and correlate this with the student's academic achievement and year of study. Materials and Methods: Data were collected from 126 female undergraduate 4th and 5th year dental students who conducted self-assessment of class II cavity preparations following minimal invasive principles and composite resin restorations on patients followed by evaluation by two calibrated and independent evaluators using a standardized rubric. Numerical data were presented as mean and standard deviation values. Agreement was analyzed using intra-class correlation coefficient and correlations were analyzed using Spearman's rank order correlation coefficient. Results: For 4th-year students, there was no significant difference between students' self-assessment and faculty scores regarding retention form and shade matching ( Conclusion: Students from both 4th and 5th years of study tend to overestimate the assessment of their cavity preparations and restorations; however, there is no correlation between this and their level of academic achievement.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.