Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40633804›Full record

ReviewClinical endoscopy2025

Recent advancement in endoscopic diagnosis for risk stratification of gastric cancer.

Takuma Hiramatsu, Naomi Kakushima, Hikaru Kuribara, Ryohei Miyata, Hideki Nakagawa, Hiroyuki Hisada, Dai Kubota, Yuko Miura, Hiroya Mizutani, Daisuke Ohki and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Takuma HiramatsuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Naomi KakushimaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hikaru KuribaraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryohei MiyataDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideki NakagawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki HisadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Dai KubotaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuko MiuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroya MizutaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke OhkiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Chihiro TakeuchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Seiichi YakabiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yosuke TsujiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobutake YamamichiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsuhiro FujishiroDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 90% of cases of gastric cancer (GC) are caused by Helicobacter pylori infection, and screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy is effective for secondary prevention of GC. Endoscopic findings of the stomach due to H. pylori infection vary widely, and the risk of GC varies according to each finding. GC risk is evaluated by combining endoscopic and histopathological findings. In the operative link on gastritis assessment and operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia assessment staging, GC risk is determined by histopathological evaluation. In the endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia, Kyoto classification, and modified Kyoto classification, the risk is considered based on endoscopic findings. However, evaluating endoscopic findings is challenging because the evaluation varies depending on the skill of the endoscopist. Similarly, histopathological findings can be assessed differently by different pathologists. Histopathological evaluation by biopsy carries a risk of bleeding; thus, simpler and less-invasive risk stratification methods are desirable. Artificial intelligence for risk stratification, which has the potential for improved accuracy and consistency, has been developed for endoscopic and histopathological evaluations. Appropriate GC risk stratification would benefit the economy and patients, and further evaluation of surveillance intervals tailored to individual risks is warranted.

Indexed as

ClassificationEarly detection of cancerNeoplasmsSecondary preventionStomach neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID40633804
PMCPMC12933536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.