ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025
Outcomes of esophageal diversion and long-term prognosis: A single-institution experience.
Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Esophageal diversion after esophageal catastrophe: from institutional experience to collective progress.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- One step backward, two steps forward: esophageal diversion and the staged reconstruction of esophageal catastrophe.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Long‑term outcomes after esophageal diversion: insights and implications.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEsophageal diversion of the esophagus is a last resort but effective procedure to control esophageal crises. Existing reports on this procedure are sporadic, and the prognosis is difficult to predict.
methodsWe performed a single-institution, retrospective study of patients who underwent esophageal diversion with cervical esophagostomy from 2014 to 2023. Esophageal diversion was performed for primary and secondary esophageal pathologies, including referrals from outside facilities. Primary outcomes are survival and reconstruction rate.
resultsDuring the study period, a total of 170 patients underwent esophageal diversion with cervical esophagostomy for various pathologies: 26 conduit ischemia after esophagectomy, 42 perforations (11 malignant), 24 tracheoesophageal fistula, 30 esophagectomies with delayed reconstruction, 24 conduit revisions, and 24 other benign pathologies. Survival to discharge was 84.1%. Reconstruction was performed in 97 patients (57.1%) after a median of 6.3 months. The primary reason for nonreconstruction was poor health or death (60 patients [82.2%]), followed by malignancy progression (9 patients [12.3%]). Gastric conduit was used for substernal reconstruction in 81 patients (83.5%), whereas 15 colon interpositions and 1 Roux-en-Y jejunal reconstruction were also utilized (16.5%). Despite high leak rates, 42.0% with gastric conduits, the majority of them were managed conservatively, and the survival to discharge after reconstruction was 94.8%. Median survival after reconstruction was 69.9 months.
conclusionsEsophageal diversion ensures safe control of the crisis, even in the face of complex esophageal pathologies. Despite the high anastomotic leak rate following reconstruction, long-term survival was favorable once patients recovered from the initial episode and underwent reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40633608What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.