ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2025
Leveraging local ancestry and cross-ancestry genetic architecture to improve genetic prediction of complex traits in admixed populations.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocol for leveraging local ancestry and cross-ancestry genetic architecture to improve polygenic prediction in admixed populations.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- An efficient LASSO framework for admixture-aware polygenic scores.HGG advances · 2026Article
- Admixture-informed polygenic risk reporting using the ePRS framework.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The broader application of polygenic risk score (PRS) is hindered by the limited transferability of PRS developed in Europeans to non-European populations. While many statistical methods have been developed to improve the performance of PRS in non-European populations, most of them focused on discrete genetic ancestry clusters and did not consider admixed individuals. Admixed individuals pose a unique challenge for PRS calculation due to the complexity of local ancestry and cross-ancestry effect sizes. Here, we present a statistical method called SDPR_admix for calculating PRS in admixed individuals. SDPR_admix characterizes the joint distribution of the effect sizes of a genetic variant with two ancestries to be both zero, ancestry enriched, or shared with correlation. SDPR_admix outperformed other methods in simulations and improved the prediction of real traits in European-African admixed individuals in UK Biobank when trained on the Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) dataset (N = 13,000). Deployment of SDPR_admix on All of Us (N = 52,000) further increased the prediction accuracy by approximately 5-fold on average compared with training on PAGE. This enhancement was achieved with manageable computational time and cost, demonstrating the feasibility of training PRS models on large-scale All of Us data. We provided several examples demonstrating that both ancestral-enriched and shared effects, as included in the SDPR_admix prediction model, are helpful for improving polygenic prediction in admixed populations. We also applied SDPR_admix to construct PRS for admixed Americans with mixture of European and Amerindigenous ancestries and showed that SDPR_admix overall outperformed other methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.