ArticleUltrasonics2025
Impact of low-amplitude pulse interspersed with histotripsy treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms on surgical mesh.
Article in Ultrasonics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound histotripsy has shown great potential for destroying bacteria biofilms on hernia mesh. The therapy could be further enhanced by reducing the necessary treatment times. In this study, we evaluated the inclusion of a low-amplitude pulse spaced between each of the high-amplitude histotripsy pulses on the effectiveness of the therapy for different treatment durations. The low-amplitude pulse consisted of between 20 and 500 cycles at 1.05 MHz with rarefactional pressure amplitudes varying from 0 (no low-amplitude pulse) to -1.9 MPa. The scan speed was varied as 0.2 mm/s, 0.8 mm/s, and 1.5 mm/s (0.18 BW/s, 0.72 BW/s, 1.35 BW/s where BW is beamwidth). The step size between scan lines was 0.2 mm or 0.4 mm (0.18 BW and 0.36 BW). The pulse repetition frequency (PRF) was varied between 62.5 and 500 Hz with the low-amplitude pulses (if present) positioned 500μs after the histotripsy pulses. The number of colony-forming units on the mesh samples was significantly reduced when a low-amplitude pulse was included between the therapy pulses provided the mechanical index (MI) of the low-amplitude pulse exceeded 1.5. Slower scan speeds also increased biofilm destruction, but the effect was much less pronounced except for very slow scan speeds of 0.18 BW/s. Thus, the use of secondary pulses reduced treatment times from 20.9 min/cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.