ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2025
Interactional Fingerprints Offer Accessible, Rapid, and Qualitative Characterization of Graphene Oxide.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Graphene-based materials (GBMs), including graphene oxide and graphene, are atomically thin materials with great promise, but efforts to realize their potential have been hampered by inconsistent material supply and the lack of rapid, accessible characterization methods. Here we present a new approach to characterization, based on surface interactions with a series of probe molecules. We demonstrate that our method facilitates qualitative comparisons of graphene oxide materials─for example, if batches of material differ─an accessible quality control method for materials producers and users alike, using widely available instruments. Furthermore, we show that in some circumstances, we may quantify systematic differences, such as surface modifications. Since many applications of materials depend on surface interactions, we suggest that this approach is applicable beyond quality control as a more direct approach to probe material surfaces and a valuable alternative to instrumental methods in GBMs and beyond.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.