ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025
Creating a data processing warehouse to support performance monitoring of cancer screening programmes in Europe using a common set of indicators.
Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From evidence to action: the IARC's role in strengthening cancer prevention and early detection.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The CanScreen-ECIS project implemented by International Agency for Research on Cancer aimed to define indicators to monitor, breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung cancer screening and create a validated mechanism for the European screening programmes to be able to systematically collect and submit performance data for public dissemination through European Cancer Information System (ECIS). Indicators were developed through a stepwise process of literature review, Delphi survey followed by face-to-face interaction. A survey questionnaire to report policies, protocols, and organization of screening programmes and a data collection tool to estimate indicators across the screening continuum were designed. These were integrated into a data warehouse to permit programme managers to access the tools, undergo training, submit data, and estimate the indicators. The same warehouse would allow peer-reviewing of submitted information and data and will ultimately be connected to ECIS for data visualization. Functionalities of the tools and the warehouse were pilot tested through data collection from several European countries. Total 23 indicators were selected based on priority and feasibility. Programme managers from 23 European countries completed the surveys and submitted data from national/regional screening programmes. Data to estimate the indicators were obtained from 17, 13, and 15 breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening programmes, respectively. Major challenges identified by the participants included collecting data from opportunistic screening and data disaggregated by socio-economic status and other indicators of inequalities. The data warehouse will facilitate systematic data collection to report the status and performance of cancer screening programmes in the EU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.