ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2025
Can Neural Networks Learn Atomic Stick-Slip Friction?
Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting Interfacial Pull-Out Performance of Nano-BPolymers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanofriction experiments typically produce force traces exhibiting atomic stick-slip oscillations, which researchers have traditionally analyzed with ad hoc algorithms. This study successfully unravels the potential of machine learning (ML) to interpret nanofriction force traces and automatically extract Prandtl-Tomlinson (PT) model parameters. A prototypical neural network (NN) perceptron was trained on synthetic force traces generated by simulations across a wide parameter range. Despite its simplicity, this NN successfully analyzed experimental data, marking the first application of a network trained solely on computational data to experimental nanofriction. Challenges encountered in developing the NN model proved to be instructive and revealing. Poor transferability from synthetic to experimental data sets was resolved by incorporating physics-based descriptors into the synthetic training data, without experimental input. Our protocol's simplicity underscores its proof-of-concept nature, paving the way for advanced approaches. Validation with experimental data, such as graphene-coated AFM tips on 2D materials, highlights the promise of this ML approach for stick-slip nanofriction studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.