ArticleAnnals of botany2026
Are capitula inflorescences? A reassessment based on flower-like meristem identity and ray flower development.
Article in Annals of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe capitulum of Asteraceae has traditionally been interpreted as a condensed raceme. However, morphological studies challenge this view, indicating that the capitulum does not arise from an inflorescence meristem, but from a determinate floral unit meristem. Terminology, combined with conflicting evidence from developmental genetics, has hindered the formulation of a coherent evolutionary scenario for the origin of the capitulum. In this paper, we aim to refine the floral unit concept and critically re-examine the hypothesis that ray flowers in Asteraceae represent remnants of ancestral thyrsoid branching.
methodsApproaching from evolutionary-developmental morphology, we performed a detailed analysis of capitulum development in 20 highly diverse Asteraceae species, encompassing three subfamilies and 11 tribes, using scanning electron microscopy. We focused on early capitulum development, ray flower formation and changes in meristem geometry. KEY
resultsWe show that the capitulum meristem is determinate and exhibits developmental features characteristic of flowers, thereby fulfilling the definition of a floral unit meristem. Continuous meristem expansion changes geometrical conditions and triggers spontaneous fractionation of flower meristems. The early developmental delay of ray flowers and the rare occurrence of bidirectional fractionation in the capitulum meristem can be explained morphologically by local expansion dynamics and mechanical pressure.
conclusionsOur findings support the hypothesis that the capitulum meristem is distinct from an inflorescence meristem and instead recapitulates developmental properties of a flower meristem at a higher level of organization. This challenges the phylogenetic view that the capitulum evolved through gradual transformation of an ancestral thyrse. Instead, we propose that a single developmental shift (from an indeterminate reproductive meristem to a determinate floral unit meristem) was sufficient to give rise to the capitulum. The early determinacy of the meristem and the insertion of an additional step of fractionation are best explained by heterochronic changes, such as ontogenetic abbreviation and prolongation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.