ArticleACS chemical biology2025
Live-Cell NanoBRET Assay to Measure AKT Inhibitor Binding to Conformational States of AKT.
Article in ACS chemical biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of NanoBRET cellular target engagement assays in primary neurons for activating mutants of p21-activated kinase 1.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Advances in BRET probes for intracellular target engagement studies.Nature chemical biology · 2026Review
- Machine learning for drug-target interaction prediction: A comprehensive review of models, challenges, and computational strategies.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AKT is the main protein kinase of the PI3K-AKT pathway, interacting with over one hundred protein partners to facilitate cellular processes that allow cancer cells to survive and proliferate. It is an attractive target due to its control over many cellular outputs. However, ATP-competitive and allosteric AKT inhibitors have performed poorly in clinical trials. AKT inhibitor interactions with AKT are multifaceted and influence the catalytic activity of AKT, its conformation, its ability to interact with binding partners, and its phosphorylation state. Therefore, a better understanding of how these inhibitors influence these parameters is needed, especially in a cellular context. Using a live-cell NanoBRET target engagement assay to query the binding of AKT inhibitors to all isoforms of AKT, we found that ATP-competitive inhibitors bind similarly across all three isoforms and allosteric inhibitors bind more heterogeneously. Further, assaying gain-of-function pathological mutants and myristoylated active versions of all AKT isoforms revealed that T308 phosphorylation enhances the binding of ATP-competitive inhibitors. We found that this phosphorylation is a good indicator of cell viability sensitivity to ATP-competitive inhibitors when comparing effects on known resistant and sensitive triple-negative breast cancer cell lines. Taken together, these findings are useful for screening new AKT inhibitors, and these findings represent important considerations in developing the next generation of AKT inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.