SynthesisPloS one2025
The effect of vitamin supplementation on neurodevelopmental and clinical outcomes in very low birth weight and very preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on "Vitamin E for intraventricular hemorrhage prevention in preterm neonates: A systematic review and meta-analysis".Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2026Article
- Developmental care for preterm infants: a scoping review of interventions, outcomes, and implementation contexts.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- The Paradox of Stunting: Differences in the Perception of Health Workers in Community Health Centers and Experts in Hospitals on Low Birth Weight and Stunting Data.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Oxidant Stress, Hyperoxia/Hypoxia and Neonatal Respiratory Disorders.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Two-year outcomes after early postnatal high-dose fat-soluble enteral vitamin A supplementation in extremely low birth weight infants: follow-up of the NeoVitaA randomized controlled trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNutrition is vital for preterm infant development. Vitamins play key roles as cofactors and gene regulators for metabolic and immune functions and are common added components of preterm infant nutrition. However, information on how vitamins impact in-hospital and neurodevelopmental outcomes is sparse. We aimed to determine the effect of fat- and water-soluble vitamin supplementation on clinical outcomes during neonatal care and later neurodevelopment of very preterm (≤32 weeks' gestation) and very low birth weight (≤1500 g) infants. METHODS AND
findings4 databases and 3 clinical trial registries were systematically searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effect model for each vitamin subgroup. Data are presented as risk ratios [95% confidence intervals]. Of 4074 references identified, 43 studies were included in the review. Only 2 reported neurodevelopment at 2 years, and only 4 were studies of water-soluble vitamins (vitamin C, 3 studies; B12 and folate, 1 study). Survival free from neurodisability was not affected by supplementation of vitamin A (0.89 [0.74-1.08], n = 538, very low certainty of evidence) or vitamin D (0.76 [0.46-1.27], n = 78, very low certainty of evidence). The incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia was decreased by vitamins D (0.58 [0.41-0.83]) and C (0.59 [0.37-0.93]), very low certainty of evidence), retinopathy of prematurity was decreased by vitamins A (0.77 [0.61-0.98]) and E (0.10 [0.01-0.80]), very low to low certainty of evidence) and intraventricular haemorrhage was decreased by vitamin E (0.70 [0.52-0.92], moderate certainty of evidence). Culture-proven sepsis was decreased by vitamin A (0.88 [0.77-0.99], moderate certainty of evidence).
conclusionsThere are few and inconclusive data on the effect of vitamin supplementation in preterm infants on later neurodevelopment. Evidence for shorter-term outcomes is mostly of low certainty. Together with substantial heterogeneity in trial design, it therefore is difficult to recommend a specific supplementation regimen. Registry and Registry Number: This systematic review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO, ID CRD42023418552, available from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023418552.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.