Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40632796›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Keeping the "R" in LARC (long-acting reversible contraception): Measuring client-centered implant removal services in sub-Saharan Africa.

Celia Karp, Katherine Tumlinson, Brooke W Bullington, Linnea A Zimmerman, Leigh Senderowicz

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Celia KarpDepartment of Population Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4050-7602
Katherine TumlinsonCarolina Population Center and Department of Health Planning and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8314-8219
Brooke W BullingtonDepartment of Epidemiology and Carolina Population Center, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3341-087X
Linnea A ZimmermanDepartment of Population Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0118-0889
Leigh SenderowiczDepartment of Gender and Women's Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Health Disparities Research Scholars Training Program-RenewalT32HD049302 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Maureen S Durkin · 2007 to 2026
$5.6M
Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD047873 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Katherine J. Curtis · 2014 to 2026
$5.1M
Training Program in Reproductive, Perinatal, and Pediatric EpidemiologyT32HD052468 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Julie L Daniels · 2008 to 2026
$3.8M
Service Delivery Factors Influencing Contraceptive Use Dynamics in Developing Countries: A Mixed-Methods and Cross-Disciplinary ApproachR00HD086270 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TUMLINSON, KATHERINE M · 2017 to 2019
$665k
Research Training Program in Reproductive and Sexual HealthR25HD115514 · NICHD · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JESSICA N SANDERS, David Turok · 2024 to 2026
$474k
Contraceptive Autonomy: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Developing a Novel Family Planning MeasureK01HD113818 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Leigh Gabrielle Senderowicz · 2024 to 2026
$411k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD113818NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD047873NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD086270NICHD NIH HHS R25 HD115514NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD049302NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD052468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the use of subdermal contraceptive implants increases across sub-Saharan Africa, the need for person-centered removal services is more critical than ever to safeguard reproductive autonomy. In 2016, Christofield and Lacoste proposed eight conditions for client-centered implant removal, yet the extent to which these conditions have been assessed in large-scale surveys remains unexamined. Our mapping exercise collates survey information from three large data collection platforms fielded in sub-Saharan Africa, including the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA), and the Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA), utilizing questionnaire tools implemented among women, health facilities, providers, and clients to map existing data sources against these conditions. Our findings reveal that four of the eight conditions are fully captured, three are partially captured, and one is entirely absent within current population or facility-based surveys. Specifically, among the six facility-based conditions: the three conditions completely captured include the availability of supplies (condition 2), systems for managing difficult removals (condition 3), and the provision of counseling and reinsertion options (condition 5); two conditions partially captured include competent and confident providers (condition 1) and affordability for clients (condition 7), and the one condition that remained absent was measurement systems for monitoring of removal data (condition 8). Among the two individual-level conditions, timely and proximate service (condition 4) was partially captured and knowledge and awareness of where to go for removal (condition 6) was fully captured. Nearly a decade after Christofield and Lacoste proposed these client-centered conditions, the lack of consistent measures for client-centered implant removal poses significant barriers to understanding service accessibility and women's reproductive experiences. To protect the reproductive autonomy of individuals who use long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods and desire timely discontinuation, it is imperative to develop and implement standardized metrics for their removal.

Identifiers

PMID40632796
PMCPMC12240386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.