Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40632759›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2025

Emotional skills and health assessment in interventions for intimate partner violence perpetrators: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Miguel Mora-Pelegrín, María Aranda, Beatriz Montes-Berges

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miguel Mora-PelegrínJaén Penitentiary Center, Jaén, Spain.
María ArandaDepartment of Psychology/ Area of Social Psychology, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1905-8379
Beatriz Montes-BergesDepartment of Psychology/ Area of Social Psychology, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study had two objectives: 1) To analyze the effectiveness of intervention programs for intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators that include learning emotional skills; and 2) to examine whether these programs assess variables related to the health and well-being of IPV perpetrators as a result of the intervention, and whether the obtained personal benefits are leveraged to enhance motivation towards therapy. This systematic review was carried out following the PRISMA guidelines. PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus and PsycARTICLES databases were searched for articles published between January 2000 and December 2023, in order to identify randomized controlled trials of interventions for IPV perpetrators that included learning emotional skills, and that considered the health and well-being of the participants as motivational aspects in therapy. Fifteen primary studies that met the selection and eligibility criteria were included. The results indicated that slightly over half of the intervention programs for IPV perpetrators who develop emotional competencies were more effective in reducing recidivism and improving variables associated with this type of violence than were those that did not include this type of learning (53% of the trials showed significant differences in favor of the intervention groups). In addition, it became evident that the personal benefits obtained by the participants during therapy, which are related to their health and degree of well-being, are barely considered in efforts to improve motivational strategies. These results have important practical implications: firstly, they allow adjusting the contents of intervention programs for IPV perpetrators more effectively and, secondly, they add new elements that help the participants to improve their motivation and adherence to therapy.

Indexed as

EmotionsIntimate Partner ViolenceFemaleHumansMaleMotivationRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID40632759
PMCPMC12240372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.