Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40632754›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2025

The Neo-MILK Web App as a Health Technology to Support Mothers of Preterm and Sick Neonates During Lactation: Usability Study.

Isabella Schwab, Tim Ohnhaeuser, Roxane Lee Rothe, Till Dresbach, Katharina Schmitz, Natalie Tutzer, Nicola Gabriela Dymek, Juliane Köberlein-Neu, Nadine Scholten, Neo-Milk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Isabella SchwabInstitute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Eupener Straße 129, Cologne, 50933, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0476-2814
Tim OhnhaeuserInstitute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Eupener Straße 129, Cologne, 50933, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7606-9763
Roxane Lee RotheDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8340-1277
Till DresbachDepartment of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care, Children's Hospital, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7074-7933
Katharina SchmitzDepartment of Neonatology, Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5491-024X
Natalie TutzerTAKEPART Media + Science GmbH, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2787-8511
Nicola Gabriela DymekCentre for Health Economics and Health Services Research, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3594-2617
Juliane Köberlein-NeuCentre for Health Economics and Health Services Research, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3451-7847
Nadine ScholtenDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7793-7745
Neo-Milk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mothers of sick and preterm infants need support to establish and maintain lactation. Although many health technologies on breastfeeding are available, most lack in evidence-based information and are therefore not appropriate for educating mothers. Furthermore, they do not focus on the special challenges of mother-infant separation during lactation in mothers of sick or preterm infants. Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the usability and perceived usefulness of the evidence-based information about lactation and documentation tools contained in the Neo-MILK web app. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among mothers of sick and preterm infants admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit in Germany. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the System Usability Scale (SUS) and for self-developed items pertaining to overall satisfaction and perceived usefulness of the app. These included items on evidence-based information and the usability of tracking functions. Results: Of 341 mothers who were contacted, 80 responded (response rate, 23.4%), and data from 63 mothers were analyzed. The mean SUS score was 76.4. The overall satisfaction rate was high, with 84% (n=53) of respondents indicating that they were either satisfied or very satisfied. Further, 82% (n=52) were inclined to recommend the web app to other parents. On average, the evidence-based information was perceived as helpful, more detailed, and not contradictory compared to information provided at the hospital. At the same time, most of the users reported that the Neo-MILK web app did not exert pressure to provide breast milk to their infants. Approximately 71% (n=45) of the mothers used the documentation tool in the web app several times per week to track their milk volumes. Conclusions: By combining evidence-based information and useful tools to document milk volume, the Neo-MILK web app was high rated in usability and perceived usefulness. Considering the limitations of the study, this web app appears to be a valuable tool for educating and supporting pump-dependent mothers of sick and preterm infants during lactation.

Indexed as

lactationlactation web appmHealthmobile healthmother’s own milkperceived usefulnesspreterm and sick infantspumpingusability

Identifiers

PMID40632754
PMCPMC12266295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.