Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40632753›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

A Web-Based Well-Being and Resilience Intervention for Family Members and Friends Supporting a Loved One Using Alcohol and Other Drugs: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.

Steph Kershaw, Jessica Deng, Madeleine Keaveny, Bronte Speirs, Anna Grager, Dara Sampson, Kate Ross, Nicola Newton, Maree Teeson, Frances Kay-Lambkin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Steph KershawThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, 160 City Road, Level 6 G02 Jane Foss Russell Building, Sydney, 2006, Australia, 61 0286279048.ORCID 0000-0003-2494-4391
Jessica DengThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, 160 City Road, Level 6 G02 Jane Foss Russell Building, Sydney, 2006, Australia, 61 0286279048.ORCID 0009-0005-0096-4330
Madeleine KeavenyThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, 160 City Road, Level 6 G02 Jane Foss Russell Building, Sydney, 2006, Australia, 61 0286279048.ORCID 0000-0001-6762-2128
Bronte SpeirsThe University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8018-2179
Anna GragerThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, 160 City Road, Level 6 G02 Jane Foss Russell Building, Sydney, 2006, Australia, 61 0286279048.ORCID 0009-0007-7322-9091
Dara SampsonThe University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2666-3393
Kate RossThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, 160 City Road, Level 6 G02 Jane Foss Russell Building, Sydney, 2006, Australia, 61 0286279048.ORCID 0000-0002-8223-9546
Nicola NewtonThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, 160 City Road, Level 6 G02 Jane Foss Russell Building, Sydney, 2006, Australia, 61 0286279048.ORCID 0000-0001-6305-2623
Maree TeesonThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, 160 City Road, Level 6 G02 Jane Foss Russell Building, Sydney, 2006, Australia, 61 0286279048.ORCID 0000-0002-6744-463X
Frances Kay-LambkinThe University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4252-5572
Cath ChapmanThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, 160 City Road, Level 6 G02 Jane Foss Russell Building, Sydney, 2006, Australia, 61 0286279048.ORCID 0000-0002-2460-6862

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the known psychosocial challenges associated with supporting a loved one using alcohol and other drugs (AOD), there is a scarcity of mental health and well-being interventions for affected friends and family members (AFFMs). Stigma has also been shown to discourage help-seeking among AFFMs. Web-based interventions may facilitate help-seeking by ensuring privacy and anonymity. Objective: This pilot study examines the usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the Family and Friend Support Program (FFSP), a world-first, evidence-based web-based resilience and well-being program designed with, and for, people caring for someone using AOD. This study also examined AFFM's experiences of caring for a loved one using AOD and their help-seeking behaviors and barriers. Methods: In 2021 (November-December), participants across Australia completed a baseline web-based cross-sectional survey that assessed the impact of caring for a loved one using AOD (adapted Short Questionnaire for Family Members-Affected by Addiction), and distress levels (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale [K-10]). Following baseline, participants were invited to interact with the FFSP over 10 weeks. Postprogram and follow-up surveys (10 and 14 wk postbaseline, respectively) and semistructured interviews assessed the usability and acceptability of the program, as well as help-seeking experiences and barriers. Results: Baseline surveys were completed by 131 AFFMs, with 37% (n=49) completing the postprogram survey and 24% (n=32) completing the follow-up survey. A total of 5 participants took part in individual semistructured interviews at postprogram. On average, K-10 scores fell in the moderate to severe range at baseline (mean 28.4, SD 8.6). At postprogram, the majority of participants (n=27, 55.1%) reported that they did not seek help to cope with or manage their role supporting their loved one and the most common endorsed barrier was cost (n=11, 28.6%). Overall, participants found the FFSP easy to use and provided them with relevant, helpful, and validating information. The majority (n=35, 71.5%) of participants said they would be likely to recommend the FFSP to a person supporting a loved one using AOD. Qualitative responses highlighted the need for free, accessible support for AFFMs such as the FFSP. Limitations included low program engagement and high attrition. Conclusions: Overall, the FFSP appears to be a promising mental health intervention for AFFMs. This study builds on existing research finding high levels of distress among AFFMs, while highlighting the ongoing barriers to help-seeking. Limitations and future directions for refinements and future efficacy evaluation of the FFSP are discussed including ways to address attrition and increase engagement.

Indexed as

FamilyFriendsInternet-Based InterventionResilience, PsychologicalSubstance-Related DisordersAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHelp-Seeking BehaviorHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSocial Supportaffected friends and family membershelp-seekingmobile phonepilot trialsubstance useweb-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID40632753
PMCPMC12266297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.