Observational studyPloS one2025
"My skills are going to be exposed" - Anxiety, meaning and professional identity during simulation-based learning in medical students: A mixed method study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is simulation always a safe learning environment? Anxiety and social anxiety symptoms in first-year medical students during simulated patient encounters.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Case-based Learning and Artificial Intelligence-based Gamification to Improve Undergraduate Students' Motivation for One Health and Climate Change: A Pilot Study.Medical science educator · 2026Article
- From Simulation to the Clinical Area: A Mixed-Methods Study Comparing Skills Laboratory Proficiency and Clinical Performance (RLE) Among Nursing Students in a Philippine University.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical simulation is an established part of the educational offering for healthcare workers, yet for many it can induce feelings of anxiety and uncertainty. The role of these feelings in enhancing or impeding the pedagogical experience is unclear, but it is likely that there are mediating and moderating factors that affect the relationship. We undertook a prospective, observational, mixed methods study of a cohort of medical students undergoing a paediatric critical illness simulation course. Our quantitative aims were to understand whether increased state anxiety correlated negatively with simulation effectiveness. Our qualitative aim was to understand how students experienced their anxiety in relation to their learning experience during the simulation. We found that there was no significant relationship between state anxiety and simulation effectiveness. However, during qualitative interviews, we uncovered a rich seam of material regarding the students' experience which coalesced around three broad themes - anticipation of the unknown, the nature of being observed, and the realism of clinical simulation, which elicited reflections among students on their future professional responsibilities and identity. We found that these feelings were simultaneously triggers for anxiety - and we suggest some practical ways of reducing the stress associated with this - and also the gateway to great insight for students into their learning process. Traditionally, learning in medicine has been associated with a maladaptive culture of perfection - high academic expectations, the perception that the ability to recall under pressure is the hallmark of a good doctor, and unwillingness to admit to vulnerability or error. Simulation leads students to the understanding that successful performance in real clinical settings requires asking for help, recognising the demands on and the limitations of available resources, and being able to navigate uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.