ArticlePloS one2025
Do whispering minds tingle alike? Exploring the relationship between ASMR-sensitivity, trait-ASMR, and trigger preference.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response (ASMR) is described as a pleasant tingling sensation originating in the head and neck in response to specific audio-visual stimuli (triggers) with individuals self-classifying as ASMR-responders based on their experience of the phenomenon. There is great variability in the types of triggers that elicit ASMR across individuals, with previous attempts to categorise triggers encompassing multiple affective components across sensory domains. More recently, research indicates ASMR should be considered a personality construct, with traits falling on a spectrum regardless of ASMR-sensitivity. The current study recruited an extensive sample of ASMR viewers (n = 16,679) to investigate characteristics of trait-ASMR using psychometric properties of the ASMR-15 in self-classified ASMR-responders who either experienced 'authentic' ASMR where tingles originated in the head and neck or 'non-authentic' ASMR, where tingles originate in other bodily regions. Secondly, we explored group differences in trigger intensity by trait-ASMR and ASMR-sensitivity. K-means cluster analysis identified tripartite trait-ASMR categorisation (High/ Medium/ Low). These cluster analysis groups showed distinct profiles across the ASMR-15 subscales evidenced with medium effect sizes, whereas the difference based on authentic vs. non-authentic ASMR experience was a small effect. To identify trigger categorisation, principal component analyses revealed four key categories: Roleplay, Watching, Interpersonal care, and Tactile. Group differences by trait-ASMR grouping across the trigger categorisation revealed small to medium effects, whereas effect sizes by ASMR-sensitivity were predominantly small to negligible. This suggests we should conceptualize individual differences in ASMR experience as a trait on a spectrum rather than a dichotomous categorical variable since only trait classification accounted for individual differences in ASMR-propensity and trigger categorisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.