ArticlePloS one2025
Workpiece surface defect detection based on YOLOv11 and edge computing.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- FDMB-YOLOv11: Traffic police command gesture recognition method under different lighting conditions.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid development of modern industry has significantly raised the demand for workpieces. To ensure the quality of workpieces, workpiece surface defect detection has become an indispensable part of industrial production. Most workpiece surface defect detection technologies rely on cloud computing. However, transmitting large volumes of data via wireless networks places substantial computational burdens on cloud servers, significantly reducing defect detection speed. Therefore, to enable efficient and precise detection, this paper proposes a workpiece surface defect detection method based on YOLOv11 and edge computing. First, the NEU-DET dataset was expanded using random flipping, cropping, and the self-attention generative adversarial network (SA-GAN). Then, the accuracy indicators of the YOLOv7-YOLOv11 models were compared on NEU-DET and validated on the Tianchi aluminium profile surface defect dataset. Finally, the cloud-based YOLOv11 model, which achieved the highest accuracy, was converted to the edge-based YOLOv11-RKNN model and deployed on the RK3568 edge device to improve the detection speed. Results indicate that YOLOv11 with SA-GAN achieved mAP@0.5 improvements of 7.7%, 3.1%, 5.9%, and 7.0% over YOLOv7, YOLOv8, YOLOv9, and YOLOv10, respectively, on the NEU-DET dataset. Moreover, YOLOv11 with SA-GAN achieved an 87.0% mAP@0.5 on the Tianchi aluminium profile surface defect dataset, outperforming the other models again. This verifies the generalisability of the YOLOv11 model. Additionally, quantising and deploying YOLOv11 on the edge device reduced its size from 10,156 kB to 4,194 kB and reduced its single-image detection time from 52.1ms to 33.6ms, which represents a significant efficiency enhancement.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.