ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Record linkage without patient identifiers: Proof of concept using data from South Africa's national HIV program.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linkage of HIV treatment and population-based surveillance records in rural South Africa: the AHRI Unified Data Platform (AUDP).Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- Viral load dynamics among adults receiving HIV care in rural North-Eastern South Africa, 2015-2020: insights from a population-based record linkage study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Linkage between health databases typically requires patient identifiers such as names and personal identification numbers. We developed and validated a record linkage strategy to combine administrative health databases without identifiers for South Africa's public sector HIV program. We linked CD4 counts and HIV viral loads from South Africa's TIER.Net with the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) database for patients receiving care between 2015-2019 in Ekurhuleni District (Gauteng Province). Linkage variables were result value, specimen collection date, facility of collection, year and month of birth, and sex. We used three matching strategies: exact matching on exact values of all variables, caliper matching allowing a ± 5 day window on result date, and specimen barcode matching using unique specimen identifiers. A sequential linkage approach applied specimen barcode, followed by exact, and then caliper matching. Exact and caliper matching were validated using barcodes (available for 34% of records in TIER.Net) as a "gold standard". Performance measures were sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), share of patients linked, and percent increase in data points. We attempted to link 2,017,290 laboratory test results from TIER.Net (523,558 unique patients) with 2,414,059 NHLS test results. Exact matching achieved 69.0% sensitivity and 95.1% PPV. Caliper matching achieved 75% sensitivity and 94.5% PPV. Sequential linkage matched 41.9% using specimen barcodes, 51.3% through exact matching, and 6.8% through caliper matching, for 71.9% (95% CI: 71.9, 72.0) of test results matched overall, with 96.8% (95% CI: 96.7, 97.1) PPV and 85.9% (95% CI: 85.7, 85.9) sensitivity. This linked 86.0% (95% CI: 85.9, 86.1) of TIER.Net patients to the NHLS (N = 1,450,087), increasing laboratory results in TIER.Net by 62.6%. Linkage of TIER.Net and NHLS without patient identifiers attained high accuracy and yield without compromising privacy. The integrated cohort provides a more complete laboratory test history and supports more accurate HIV program indicator estimates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.