ArticlePLOS global public health2025
"I just wanted to be like everyone else…": Qualitative exploration of women's perspectives on female genital mutilation/cutting and its potential abandonment in Somalia.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maternal education-related inequality in female genital mutilation/cutting among daughters aged 0-14 years in three East African countries: DHS data from 2016-2022.Global health action · 2026Article
- "Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- "Basically a PR exercise…": a qualitative study of expert perspectives on 'performative versus evidence-informed' dengue vector control in the Asia-Pacific region.BMJ global health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Somalia has the highest estimated prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) globally. However, significant literature gaps exist on associated knowledge and contextual factors within the country, particularly among affected women. This study thus aimed to explore Somali women's perspectives about FGM/C and its potential abandonment in Somalia. We conducted an exploratory qualitative study, informed by critical feminist and social norms theories. Data from 20 semi-structured remote interviews with women in Somalia were analysed thematically using abductive coding. We generated three themes of normative expectations and social control, patriarchal influence and gendered power, and FGM/C support and abandonment. Women demonstrated detailed knowledge of FGM/C procedures and consequences, sharing personal experiences of living with the effects of FGM/C on their physical, mental, and sexual health. Most supported continuation of "milder" 'gudniinka sunnah' FGM/C, rather than abandoning the tradition. However, 'gudniinka sunnah' described several types of cutting, some which fit the World Health Organization typology of Type-IV (pricking, scraping) and others Type-I (removing part/all of the external clitoris), while 'gudniinka fircooniga' (Type-III) - though still occurring - was universally described negatively. While acknowledging potential harms, women expressed the need for more religious and scientific clarity before changing their generally supportive opinions of 'sunnah' FGM/C. Discussing socio-cultural and religious reasons for this preference, women described social norms of femininity and how awareness interventions affected their understanding of 'severe' FGM/C and could help responses against FGM/C in Somalia. While all FGM/C types are negatively associated with women's health and wellbeing, Type-IV is least understood. Although women opposed Type-III, they supported continuing Type-I/Type-IV as 'sunnah' FGM/C. Reasons for this practice are rooted deeply in Somali culture and require active engagement of a range of community stakeholders to enact meaningful changes. Health education can contribute to changing attitudes towards FGM/C in Somalia but is insufficient on its own, potentially benefitting from interventions to change social norms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.