Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40632719›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

"I just wanted to be like everyone else…": Qualitative exploration of women's perspectives on female genital mutilation/cutting and its potential abandonment in Somalia.

Zamzam I A Ali, Mervat Alhaffar, Natasha Howard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. "Frontiers in global women's health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zamzam I A AliDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Mervat AlhaffarDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3737-8790
Natasha HowardDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4174-7349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somalia has the highest estimated prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) globally. However, significant literature gaps exist on associated knowledge and contextual factors within the country, particularly among affected women. This study thus aimed to explore Somali women's perspectives about FGM/C and its potential abandonment in Somalia. We conducted an exploratory qualitative study, informed by critical feminist and social norms theories. Data from 20 semi-structured remote interviews with women in Somalia were analysed thematically using abductive coding. We generated three themes of normative expectations and social control, patriarchal influence and gendered power, and FGM/C support and abandonment. Women demonstrated detailed knowledge of FGM/C procedures and consequences, sharing personal experiences of living with the effects of FGM/C on their physical, mental, and sexual health. Most supported continuation of "milder" 'gudniinka sunnah' FGM/C, rather than abandoning the tradition. However, 'gudniinka sunnah' described several types of cutting, some which fit the World Health Organization typology of Type-IV (pricking, scraping) and others Type-I (removing part/all of the external clitoris), while 'gudniinka fircooniga' (Type-III) - though still occurring - was universally described negatively. While acknowledging potential harms, women expressed the need for more religious and scientific clarity before changing their generally supportive opinions of 'sunnah' FGM/C. Discussing socio-cultural and religious reasons for this preference, women described social norms of femininity and how awareness interventions affected their understanding of 'severe' FGM/C and could help responses against FGM/C in Somalia. While all FGM/C types are negatively associated with women's health and wellbeing, Type-IV is least understood. Although women opposed Type-III, they supported continuing Type-I/Type-IV as 'sunnah' FGM/C. Reasons for this practice are rooted deeply in Somali culture and require active engagement of a range of community stakeholders to enact meaningful changes. Health education can contribute to changing attitudes towards FGM/C in Somalia but is insufficient on its own, potentially benefitting from interventions to change social norms.

Identifiers

PMID40632719
PMCPMC12240340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.