Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40632697›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Children adjust behavior in novel social environment to reflect local prosocial norms inferred from brief exposure.

Kari Britt Schroeder, Laura Nelson Darling, Peter R Blake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kari Britt SchroederDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9730-876X
Laura Nelson DarlingDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Peter R BlakeDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stark cultural variation in prosocial behavior, as elicited with economic experiments, is evident despite the high mobility of humans. Conformity to local norms has been posited to play an integral role in the maintenance of this variation. Experiments suggest that adults indeed rapidly infer pro- and antisocial norms in new or altered social environments and adjust their behavior to reflect the inferred norms. Studies of the ontogeny of prosocial behavior show that by middle childhood, children's prosocial behavior conforms to that of local adults. Furthermore, by this stage, children are susceptible to the manipulation of explicit normative information. However, their propensity to extract or infer normative information from the environment and change their behavior accordingly has not been investigated. Here, we assess whether children 1) rapidly infer local prosocial norms in a novel, realistic social environment, 2) extend these inferences to norms for unobserved behaviors, and 3) alter their behavior in the novel environment to align with the inferred norms while still 4) maintaining their baseline prosocial behavior outside of the novel environment. We used questionnaires to measure children's perceived pro- and antisocial descriptive norms in their Own Neighborhoods as well as in a novel "Neighborhood X," to which they were introduced via a slideshow. Norms for Neighborhood X diverged drastically dependent upon which slideshow they witnessed (Prosocial or Antisocial condition), a result robust to the exclusion of questions about norms for behaviors observed in the slideshow. Children's perceptions of prosocial norms in their Own Neighborhoods predicted their prosocial behavior (Dictator Game) in their Own Neighborhood. Moreover, even though information about giving behavior was not presented in the slideshow, inferred norms for Neighborhood X predicted children's prosocial behavior in that neighborhood as well. These changes in prosocial behavior were transitory and specific to Neighborhood X; prosocial behavior in a separate "Helping Task" was best predicted by prosocial norms within the children's Own Neighborhoods. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that humans have a propensity to rapidly infer and conform to local prosocial norms, thus maintaining group differences in prosocial behavior, and further indicate that this propensity is in operation by middle childhood.

Indexed as

Child BehaviorSocial BehaviorSocial EnvironmentSocial NormsChildFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40632697
PMCPMC12240362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.