ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2025
An Analysis of Trainees' Operative Experiences Over the Past 16 Years Based on the Requirements of the New 2021 Cardiothoracic Surgery Curriculum in the United Kingdom and Ireland.
Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trainee exposure to valve surgery in the UK: safety, decline and organisational inequality in a national cohort.Open heart · 2026Article
- Comparing Early and Long-Term Outcomes of "Truly Autonomous" Senior Resident-Led with Consultant-Led Cardiac Surgery: A 10-Year Propensity-Matched Study.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveBefore introducing the new 7-year curriculum in 2021, cardiothoracic surgery trainees were required to complete a 2-year basic surgical training programme followed by 6 years of higher speciality training. The new curriculum eliminates the need for basic surgical training. It is outcome-based, requiring a minimum of 250 major cases performed as the first operator. We assess trainees' operative experiences over the past 16 years based on the requirements of the new curriculum. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on training was also investigated.
participantsAll trainees who commenced higher cardiothoracic surgical training from 2007 and graduated were included. Operative volumes were categorised into 13 major procedures (6 cardiac and 7 thoracic). The total number of major cases logged and the time required to achieve 250 cases were evaluated.
resultsA total of 290 trainees were included, of whom 145 (50%) had completed training with validated eLogbooks. The median number of cases logged was 378 (interquartile range [IQR]: 309, 474) for all trainees across their training period. Cardiac-themed trainees logged 378 (IQR: 312.5, 474.5) cases, of which 202 (IQR: 166.5, 257.0) were coronary artery bypass grafting, followed by aortic valve surgery (n = 39, 14%, IQR: 15, 54.5). Thoracic-themed trainees logged 383.5 (IQR: 304.5, 469.75) cases, of which 345 (IQR: 270.25, 457.75) were anatomical lung resections followed by surgery for secondary pneumothorax (n = 124, 35%, IQR: 100.25, 165.0). The median time required to achieve 250 cases was 6.25 and 5.25 years for cardiac and thoracic trainees, respectively. There was an increase in time for trainees to complete higher surgical training before and during/after the COVID-19 pandemic (median 6 [IQR: 5, 8] vs 7 [IQR: 6, 10] years, P = 0.01).
conclusionThe new 2021 curriculum's target of 250 major cases appears feasible. However, post-COVID-19 reductions in surgical volume and the removal of basic surgical training require integration and reform to ensure trainees can complete the programme in the 7-year timeframe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.