Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40632548›Full record

ArticleJAMA psychiatry2025

Profiles of Genetic Risks for Psychotic Disorders.

Kenneth S Kendler, Henrik Ohlsson, Jan Sundquist, Kristina Sundquist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kenneth S KendlerVirginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
Henrik OhlssonCenter for Primary Health Care Research, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Jan SundquistCenter for Primary Health Care Research, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Kristina SundquistCenter for Primary Health Care Research, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The etiologic interrelationship of 4 rare/controversial psychotic disorders (delusional disorder [DD], acute psychoses [AP], psychosis not otherwise specified [PNOS], and schizoaffective disorder [SAD]) is poorly understood. Objective: To assess levels of the family genetic risk score (FGRS) for schizophrenia (SZ), bipolar disorder (BD), and major depression (MD) in individuals with DD, AP, PNOS, and SAD, thereby clarifying their genetic relationships. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included all individuals born in Sweden between 1950 and 2000 to Swedish-born parents followed up until 2018 with diagnoses of MD, BD, SZ, SAD, AP, PNOS, and DD, based on diagnosis codes from national registries. Exposures: FGRS for SZ, BD, and MD calculated from first- through fifth-degree relatives, controlling for cohabitation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Diagnoses of DD, AP, PNOS, and SAD. Results: In the cohort, 667 012 individuals had MD (420 142 females [63%] and 246 870 males [37.0%]), 58 385 had BD (36 344 females [62%] and 22 041 males [38%]), 17 465 had SZ (6330 females [36%] and 11 135 males [64%]), 7597 had SAD (4125 females [54%] and 3472 males [46%]), 16 315 had AP (7907 females [49%] and 8408 males [51%]), 27 127 had PNOS (12 277 females [45%] and 14 850 males [55%]), and 11 560 had DD (5060 females [44%] and 6500 males [56%]). On "genetic maps" of SZ FGRS, BD FGRS, and MD FGRS, DD stood alone with approximately half the genetic risk for SZ compared with SZ cases and similar levels of BD and MD risk. SAD was also distinct as the only disorder with quite high genetic risks for both SZ and BD and was clearly separable from psychotic BD. AP and PNOS had similar genetic profiles with levels of SZ FGRS similar to DD but higher levels of genetic risk for BD and MD. Subdividing psychoses by outcome produced minimal effects on the DD genetic profile, moderate effects on AP and PNOS, and large effects on SAD, with good social outcomes associated with decreased SZ FGRS and increased BD FGRS. Conclusions and Relevance: In a Swedish population, none of the 4 disorders appeared, from a genetic perspective, to be subtypes of SZ, BD, or MD. Further genetics research on the syndromes of DD, AP, PNOS, and SAD have much to teach about the relationship between dimensions of genetic risks and the clinical presentation and course of psychotic illness.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseMajor Depressive DisorderPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRisk FactorsSweden

Identifiers

PMID40632548
PMCPMC12242816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.