ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Multimodal zero-shot learning of previously unseen epitranscriptomes from RNA-seq data.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sequence determinant and functional relevance of 8-oxoguanine RNA modification unveiled from foundation-model-based predictor.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
- Integrative interpretable learning reveals shared patterns of epitranscriptomic regulation across multiple cancer types.BMC biology · 2026Article
- OMetaNet: an efficient hybrid deep learning model based on multimodal data fusion and contrastive learning for predicting 2'-O-methylation sites in human RNA.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Statistical modeling of immunoprecipitation efficiency of MeRIP-seq data enabled accurate detection and quantification of epitranscriptome.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precise identification of condition-specific epitranscriptomes is of critical importance for investigating the dynamics and versatile functions of RNA modification under various biological contexts. Existing approaches for predicting condition-specific RNA modification are usually trained on epitranscriptome data obtained from the same condition, which limited their usage, as such data are available only for a small number of conditions due to the technical difficulties and high expenses of epitranscriptome profiling technologies. We present ExpressRM, a multimodal zero-shot learning framework for predicting condition-specific RNA modification sites in previously unseen contexts from genome and RNA-seq data. Different from existing in-condition learning approaches, this method does not rely on matched epitranscriptome data for training, which greatly expands its applicability. On a benchmark dataset comprising epitranscriptomes and matched transcriptomes of 37 human tissues, we demonstrate that ExpressRM can accurately predict epitranscriptomes of previously unseen conditions from their transcriptomes only, and the performance is comparable to existing in-condition learning algorithms that require epitranscriptome data from the same condition. Additionally, the method has the capability of differentiating highly dynamic RNA methylation sites from more static (or house-keeping) ones. With a case study, we show that ExpressRM can uncover N6-methyladenosine RNA methylation sites in glioblastoma using only its RNA-seq data, and unveils novel and previously validated pathological insights. Together, these results suggest that the proposed multimodal zero-shot learning framework can effectively leverage transcriptome knowledge to explore the dynamic roles of RNA modifications in previously unseen experimental setups, providing valuable insights into vast biological contexts where RNA-seq is routinely used but epitranscriptome profiling has not yet been covered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.