ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025
Development and characterisation of a high-sensitivity X-ray CT polymer gel dosimeter.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polymer gel dosimeters have shown potential for clinical 3D dosimetry; however, their use has been limited due to low sensitivity and reliance on scarcely available magnetic resonance imaging. This study aimed to optimise a PASSAG (Poly AMPS Sodium Salt And Gelatin) polymer gel dosimeter for X-ray computed tomography, to enhance its clinical feasibility. The total monomer concentration was increased to improve sensitivity, and different cosolvents were tested to enhance the limited solubility of N, N'-methylenebisacrylamide, the crosslinker. n-propanol was identified as the optimal cosolvent, allowing for an 18.3% monomer concentration, 30% crosslinker to total comonomer mass gel, at a 3:7 cosolvent-to-water ratio. The optimised formulation, PASSAG-N (PASSAG- n-propanol), consisted of 54.4% w/w deionised water, 23.3% n-propanol, 12.8% 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid sodium salt, 5.5% N, N'-methylenebisacrylamide, 4.0% gelatin, and 0.089% (4.65mM) tetrakis (hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride. The dosimeter was irradiated within a standard timeframe to assess its sensitivity, and theoretical calculations confirmed its equivalence to water, soft tissue, brain, and muscle. Compared to a cosolvent-free formulation, PASSAG-N exhibited a 250% increase in Hounsfield unit (HU) change, demonstrating enhanced sensitivity. The optimised gel showed a linear response over a 1-12 Gy dose range, with an average sensitivity of 1.072 ± 0.041 HU Gy⁻¹ and a dose resolution ≤ 0.31 Gy, making it a promising alternative for clinical X-ray computed tomography-based dosimetry. This study highlights the potential of PASSAG-N as a highly sensitive and potentially practical polymer gel dosimeter for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.