ArticleAmbio2025
Online citizen dialogue on biodiversity conservation and citizen participation: A cross-cultural deliberation between Taiwan and Japan.
Article in Ambio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study empirically explored the possibility of nurturing and cultivating reflexivity capacity at the small-group level through cross-cultural online citizen dialogue on biodiversity conservation and citizens' role using a method of reflecting, connecting Taiwan and Japan. The study found that cross-cultural dialogue improved self-awareness of cultural inheritance as a hindering and promoting factor for sustainability transformation in one's own cultural community. The dialogue also expanded the perceived boundary of collaboration measured by trust score/ratio. It also brought about the positive change in self-reported attitude toward dialogue with a person holding different views, and of urgency/significance self-assessment of sustainability transformation issues, that is, biodiversity conservation and citizen participation. The institutionalization of cross-cultural citizen dialogue in collective decision-making processes, such as those of the United Nations, and reflexivity capacity building, both at the small-group and population levels through citizen dialogue connecting different cultural groups, are suggested for sustainability transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.