ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
Detection and dual-label classification of tooth number and condition in dental panoramic radiographs including deciduous teeth.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe purpose of this study is to automatically extract the information necessary for chart recording from panoramic radiographs, to reduce the workload for dentists. STUDY
designUsing 1,085 dental panoramic radiographs (994 of permanent dentition and 91 of mixed dentition) taken at 10 facilities, we conducted tooth detection, numbering, and condition classification. Tooth condition was defined into five classes: natural, partial restoration, prosthetic crown, implant, and pontic. First, the YOLOv7 model was used to simultaneously detect 10 classes of deciduous teeth, 16 classes of permanent teeth, and four classes of tooth condition (excluding natural). We applied rule-based post-processing to the detected objects. Precision, Recall, and F1-score were used to evaluate our method, with an IoU (Intersection over Union) threshold set at 0.5.
resultsWe achieved Precision, Recall, and F1-score of 98.51%, 98.38%, and 98.45%, respectively, in tooth numbering. In tooth condition classification, the average F1-score across the 5 classes was 95.47%.
conclusionsOur method, which detects and classifies the tooth numbers of permanent and deciduous teeth and their tooth condition simultaneously, is expected to contribute to reducing the workload of dentists and improving accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40632440What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.