Observational studyGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2025
An observational study of the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab plus chemotherapy for untreated advanced or recurrent gastric cancer in Japanese real-world settings: the G-KNIGHT study.
Observational study in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution of Real-World Treatment Patterns over Time in Patients with HER2-Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Database Cohort Study from Japan.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- A cDC1-NK/T-Malignant Cell Circuit Drives Immunogenic Remodeling Under PD-1 Blockade in Gastric Cancer.Cancer science · 2026Article
- Association of the PD-L1 CPS With the Efficacy of First-Line Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy for Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent Gastric Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Real-world sequential treatment patterns and outcomes in the new era of immunotherapy for advanced gastric cancer in Japan.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNivolumab plus chemotherapy has shown efficacy in clinical trials for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (GC). However, real-world utilization data are limited. In this study, we aimed to assess the effectiveness, safety, and treatment status of first line nivolumab plus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with treatment-naïve advanced or recurrent GC.
methodsUntreated patients with advanced or recurrent GC who initiated nivolumab plus chemotherapy as first line treatment from November 2021 to June 2023 across 23 Japanese sites were enrolled in this observational study (G-KNIGHT). This report focused on the objective response rate (ORR), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and the treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) incidence. Furthermore, subgroup analyses for ORR and rwPFS were conducted for patients stratified by various factors including age and the programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS).
resultsAmong 527 patients (median age, 70.3 years; 25.2% aged ≥ 75 years; 65.5% male; 84.3% with advanced GC), the median follow-up period was 10.4 (interquartile range, 6.7-15.2) months. The ORR was 65.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.9-70.9%). The median rwPFS (months, 95% CI) was 6.9 (6.2-7.6); by subgroups: age < 75 years, 6.7 (6.0-7.5); age ≥ 75 years, 7.4 (6.2-8.6); PD-L1 CPS < 1, 7.5 (6.5-9.0); CPS 1-5, 6.2 (5.5-8.0); and CPS ≥ 5, 7.0 (6.2-8.2). TRAEs occurred in 91.3% of patients, with 40.4% experiencing grade ≥ 3 events.
conclusionsThis large-scale real-world study supports the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab plus chemotherapy in untreated Japanese patients with advanced or recurrent GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.