ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2025
Intravenous combined with nebulized polymyxin B may be effective in treating carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli hospital-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Inhaled Polymyxin B: From Rabbit Optimization to Human Predictions.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous polymyxin B versus the combination of intravenous and nebulized polymyxin B for treating carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli hospital-acquired pneumonia (CRGNB-HAP), and to explore the risk factors affecting 28-day all-cause mortality.
methodOur retrospective analysis was conducted on data from CRGNB-HAP patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) with either intravenous polymyxin B alone or in conjunction with nebulized polymyxin B between November 28, 2018 and May 6, 2024. The primary endpoint was 28-day all-cause mortality, while safety outcomes were also assessed. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to identify the risk factors associated with 28-day all-cause mortality.
resultA total of 82 CRGNB-HAP patients were enrolled, including 38 patients in the intravenous plus nebulized (IV + NL) polymyxin B group and 44 patients in the intravenous (IV) polymyxin B group. The 28-day mortality rate of the IV + NL polymyxin B group was significantly lower than that of the IV polymyxin B group (23.7% vs 61.4%, p < 0.001), and there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of acute kidney injury between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that IV + NL polymyxin B administration was a significant factor in reducing the 28-day mortality rate of CRGNB-HAP patients.
conclusionOur study found that intravenous combined with nebulized polymyxin B therapy is superior to intravenous monotherapy in the treatment of CRGNB-HAP, resulting in reduced 28-day mortality without increasing renal toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.