ReviewEcoHealth2025
Disease Risks for Restoring Endangered Sahelo-Saharan Antelope: A Literature Review.
Review in EcoHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 1994, the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals identified six species of Sahelo-Saharan antelope in immediate danger of extinction. Several of these species are now subjects of large-scale conservation efforts, including reintroductions and population reinforcements across their native ranges. However, disease-related mortalities can cause major setbacks, and wildlife-livestock interfaces are widely thought to have contributed to disease and mortality events in translocated animals. We reviewed 202 English and French publications spanning 20 years (2000-2020) and the WOAH-WAHIS database for infectious diseases and parasites that could pose risks to Sahelo-Saharan antelope. Our review included countries with active conservation translocation initiatives for these species: Chad, Morocco, Senegal, and Tunisia. We found reports of 159 distinct infectious agents or parasites. Frequently identified viruses included bluetongue virus, Rift Valley fever virus, and small ruminant morbillivirus. Commonly reported bacterial and protozoal agents included Anaplasma spp., Theileria spp., and Toxoplasma spp., while common ectoparasites included Hyalomma and Rhipicephalus ticks. Sixty-nine (43%) of the infectious agents identified were potentially zoonotic, 39 (25%) were vector-borne, and 30 were WOAH-listed diseases. These findings highlight potential regional health threats to Sahelo-Saharan antelope and neighboring livestock and human communities. Targeted research is needed to elucidate the role of wildlife in the epidemiology of livestock diseases and vice versa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40632366What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.