Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40632366›Full record

ReviewEcoHealth2025

Disease Risks for Restoring Endangered Sahelo-Saharan Antelope: A Literature Review.

Lauren Ellis, Jennifer H Yu, Katherine Mertes, Stephen Cox, Ife Desamours, Mahamat Fayiz Abakar, Maria Elena Pesci, Latifa Sikli, Elizabeth A J Cook, Dawn Zimmerman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in EcoHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lauren EllisGlobal Health Program, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Jennifer H YuGlobal Health Program, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC, USA. jennhyu@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4176-6825
Katherine MertesConservation Ecology Center, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, USA.
Stephen CoxSmithsonian Libraries and Archives, Washington, DC, USA.
Ife DesamoursDepartment of Microbial Pathogenesis, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Mahamat Fayiz AbakarInstitut de Recherche en Elevage pour le Développement, N'Djamena, Chad.
Maria Elena PesciEnvironment Agency - Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Latifa SikliHaut Commissariat aux Eaux et Forêts et à la Lutte Contre la Désertification, El Haj Kaddour, Morocco.
Elizabeth A J CookInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Dawn ZimmermanGlobal Health Program, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 1994, the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals identified six species of Sahelo-Saharan antelope in immediate danger of extinction. Several of these species are now subjects of large-scale conservation efforts, including reintroductions and population reinforcements across their native ranges. However, disease-related mortalities can cause major setbacks, and wildlife-livestock interfaces are widely thought to have contributed to disease and mortality events in translocated animals. We reviewed 202 English and French publications spanning 20 years (2000-2020) and the WOAH-WAHIS database for infectious diseases and parasites that could pose risks to Sahelo-Saharan antelope. Our review included countries with active conservation translocation initiatives for these species: Chad, Morocco, Senegal, and Tunisia. We found reports of 159 distinct infectious agents or parasites. Frequently identified viruses included bluetongue virus, Rift Valley fever virus, and small ruminant morbillivirus. Commonly reported bacterial and protozoal agents included Anaplasma spp., Theileria spp., and Toxoplasma spp., while common ectoparasites included Hyalomma and Rhipicephalus ticks. Sixty-nine (43%) of the infectious agents identified were potentially zoonotic, 39 (25%) were vector-borne, and 30 were WOAH-listed diseases. These findings highlight potential regional health threats to Sahelo-Saharan antelope and neighboring livestock and human communities. Targeted research is needed to elucidate the role of wildlife in the epidemiology of livestock diseases and vice versa.

Indexed as

AntelopesCommunicable DiseasesConservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesAfrica South of the SaharaAnimalsAnimals, WildChadLivestockMoroccoSahelo-Saharan antelopeSenegalTunisia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.