ArticleMolecular diversity2026
Exploring graph-based models for predicting active compounds against triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-based screening of phytochemicals for targeted cancer therapy.Natural products and bioprospecting · 2026Review
- Recent Advances and Emerging Directions in Machine Learning-Based Breast Cancer Drug Discovery: A Comprehensive Review.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is among the most dominant and rapidly rising cancers, both in India and around the world. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is one of the most aggressive subtypes of breast cancer, distinguished by the absence of HER2, progesterone, and estrogen receptor expressions. This absence limits treatment options, emphasizing the urgent need to discover or design new drug candidates for TNBC. Integrating artificial intelligence and machine learning in computational modeling, has significantly accelerated the analysis of large-scale biological data and improved the prediction of therapeutic outcomes. In this study, we curated a data set of 756 mutant-type compounds from three cell lines and developed four graph-based models to predict active compounds against TNBC. Validated using stratified nested tenfold cross-validation and optimized with the Optuna framework, the models achieved predictive accuracy with AUC values of 0.65-0.82, with the MPNN model outperforming all the others. Furthermore, key structural fragments associated with cell inhibition and model predictions were identified and interpreted using several explainability techniques. Validation with an external set of FDA-approved drugs demonstrated prediction accuracies ranging from 66% to 97%, highlighting the robustness of the models in identifying compounds with potential inhibitory activity against TNBC cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40632362What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.