SynthesisThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2026
Measuring hospital care resilience: a systematic literature review.
Synthesis in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance indicators for evaluating and optimising hospital services during COVID-19: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Analysis of hospital resilience in public health emergencies using structural equation modeling: based on risk perception, resource preparedness, and team collaboration.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- Crisis-time efficiency in Eastern Poland's regional hospitals (2015-2024): a data envelopment analysis.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The recent Covid-19 pandemic has shown how even high-performing healthcare systems are often unprepared to cope with sudden and unforeseen surges in demand for healthcare services, drawing further attention on crucial factors ensuring their resilience in the face of extreme disruptive events. Despite extensive efforts to define health system resilience, a lack of consensus persists, making it difficult to operationalize the existing conceptual frameworks and to guide policy makers in developing adequate response strategies. Grounded on this, the present paper aims to systematically review how hospital resilience has been measured in high-income countries. Particularly, we intend to map out the different indicators and metrics used to quantitatively assess the hospitals' capacity to proactively face sudden health shocks, which can put clinical activity under pressure and at risk of disruption. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted until March 2023, by combining three databases. The review identified 1,261 studies of which 45 studies met the eligibility criteria. We found a wide range of methodological approaches that shared a narrow focus on single aspects of hospital resilience, without being able to measure it comprehensively and systematically and without accounting for its dynamic and feedback loop nature. Specifically, most of the studies looked at how to measure hospitals' capacity to absorb the shock and adapt to it, while almost neglecting their transformative capacity as well as the legacy or enduring impact of shocks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.