ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2025
Immunobiological effects of tocilizumab across respiratory subphenotypes in COVID-19 ARDS.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTwo distinct longitudinal respiratory subphenotypes have recently been described in COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). These subphenotypes exhibit dynamic immunobiological changes that may help guide immunomodulatory interventions. However, the extent to which the immune response is determined by respiratory subphenotype in the presence of concurrent immunomodulatory treatment remains unclear. We investigated the independent and combined effects of respiratory subphenotype and tocilizumab on inflammatory response and clinical outcomes.
methodsWe analyzed patients from existing COVID-19 biobanks who were consecutively admitted to the ICU and received more than 4 days of invasive mechanical ventilation between March 2020 and May 2022. Patients were classified into two previously described longitudinal respiratory subphenotypes-characterized by mechanical power, minute volume and ventilatory ratio-referred to as 'low-power' and 'high-power' subphenotypes. We analyzed how tocilizumab treatment and respiratory subphenotype were associated with endothelial and inflammatory plasma biomarkers on days 0, 4 and 7, as well as with mortality.
results720 patients were included, of whom 464 (64%) and 256 (36%) were assigned to the low- and high-power subphenotypes, respectively. 108 (23%) of the low-power subphenotype patients received tocilizumab, and 43 (17%) of the high-power subphenotype. 427 patients had plasma samples available. The high-power subphenotype was associated with slightly higher SP-D, thrombomodulin and TNF-RI plasma concentrations on the day of intubation compared to the low-power subphenotype, along with a more rapid increase in IL-6 and TNF-RI levels in subjects who had received tocilizumab treatment (β = 0.14 log ng/ml, p = 0.022, and β = 0.06 log ng/ml, p = 0.014, respectively). Tocilizumab treatment accounted for four times more variance in IL-6 and angiopoietin-2 levels than subphenotype, while subphenotype explained only a small proportion of the variance and slightly more than tocilizumab for TNF-RI and thrombomodulin. Subphenotype did not modify the association between tocilizumab and mortality (IPTW adjusted hazard ratio 1.18; 95%CI 0.60-2.33).
conclusionRespiratory subphenotypes showed varying TNF-RI and IL-6 responses to tocilizumab, but these differences were only minor compared to the drug's overall immunobiological effect. This suggests that respiratory subphenotype should not determine tocilizumab treatment decisions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.