Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40632296›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2025

Preoperative Surgical Planning and Intraoperative Considerations for the Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Joseph M Lombardi, Fthimnir M Hassan, Joseph A Osorio, Lawrence G Lenke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joseph M LombardiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Fthimnir M HassanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3928-8972
Joseph A OsorioDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Lawrence G LenkeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study DesignNarrative Review of published literature.ObjectiveThe objective of this article is to review the current state of treatment for patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) with a focus on preoperative planning, optimization and intraoperative surgical techniques, including the application of current enabling technologies to spinal deformity surgery.MethodsA literature review of publications related to preoperative planning, patient optimization, intraoperative techniques, and surgical outcomes for the treatment of ASD was performed.Results/ConclusionStandardized preoperative evaluation including imaging analysis now allows patient specific planning for the planned surgical procedure. The current work on patient optimization along with understanding and mitigating the surgical insult are being utilized as appropriate and should improve patient outcomes. The intraoperative application of enabling technologies including navigation, robotics and confirmatory radiographic software will continue to assist surgeons in safe placement of instrumentation, often with less invasive surgical techniques and achievement of intraoperative alignment goals.

Indexed as

idiopathic scoliosisinstrumentationintraoperativekyphosisosteotomyplanningpositioningpreoperativescoliosisspinal deformity

Identifiers

PMID40632296
PMCPMC12254655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.