ArticleGlobal spine journal2025
A Narrative Review of Symptom Severity and Duration in Nonoperative vs Operative Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity.
Article in Global spine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study DesignNarrative review.ObjectiveOur objective was to provide an evidence-based summary of how symptoms (severity/duration) impact timing of surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD).MethodsThe authors queried PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus to identify potentially relevant studies. Articles were included based on quality of design, methodology, assessment of symptoms (back/leg pain, neurological deficits) and other factors which could influence timing of surgery.ResultsDatabase query produced 138 potentially relevant studies. Review of these studies and relevant references generated 29 studies that were included. Back and leg pain were the most common assessed symptoms: NRS back pain (nonoperative 4.4-5.3, operative 6.3-7.1) and NRS leg pain (nonoperative 2.3-4.1, operative 4.2-5.4). Leg pain was an independent predictor of surgery. Back/leg pain positively correlated with disability and worse health status, which were important factors driving surgery. ODI ≥40 was identified as a potential disability threshold associated with surgery. Few studies (n = 2) provided assessment of neurological deficits, and development of weakness was associated with surgery. Symptom duration was assessed using post hoc analysis of nonoperative to operative crossover (n = 6; mean time to crossover 0.8-1.1 years).ConclusionsOur results suggest at least moderate symptoms should be present prior to considering surgery. Less data exists for symptom duration and is from studies reporting nonoperative to operative treatment crossover. Future research is needed to determine clinically meaningful differences in validated outcome instruments for baseline comparisons prior to treatment, provide more detailed assessments of leg pain (radiculopathy vs claudication) and deficits, and include dynamic functional testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.