ArticleGlobal spine journal2025
Identification and Management of Neurologic Complications in Patients Undergoing Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.
Article in Global spine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study DesignNarrative Literature Review.ObjectiveTo provide a comprehensive literature review of neurologic complications in Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) surgery in the pre-operative, peri-operative and post-operative periods.MethodsA broad review of the literature was conducted using the multiple databases including Pubmed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane library. Individual studies of relevance were appraised and included at the discretion of the authors on the basis of pertinence, impact on practice and scientific merit.ResultsThe evidence regarding epidemiology, classification of complications, pre-operative evaluation of patients, peri-operative strategies to mitigate risk, intra-operative management of neuromonitoring changes and post-operative management of neurologic injury was critically appraised. Patients with the highest risk of neurologic complication include those with pre-surgery neuroaxis abnormality, high Deformity Angular Ratio, 3 column osteotomies and increased blood loss. Accurate and timely identification of intraoperative neuromonitoring changes is critical to ensuring appropriate response depending on whether changes are perfusion based (maintain adequate MAP and Hb, reverse corrective maneuvers) or traumatic (decompression of neural elements, assessment of instrumentation, reversal of corrective maneuvers, steroids). Surgical checklists can help surgeons navigate these stressful events to ensure appropriate steps and interventions are taken.ConclusionNeurological injuries occurring during the course of ASD surgery are potentially devastating complication, with regards to both patient morbidity and economic impact. Pre-operative identification of high risk patients, perioperative strategies to improve safety, timely recognition and management of intra-operative neuromonitoring changes and post-operative supportive measures can potentially reduce the incidence and significance of neurological injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.