ArticleGlobal spine journal2025
Pelvic Fixation in Adult Spinal Deformity: Complications, Controversies, and Future Directions.
Article in Global spine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robot-navigated sacroiliac joint fusion as salvage surgery for pelvic fixation failure in adult spinal deformity surgery: patient series.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Modified iliac screw technique for pelvic fixation: a scoping review of technical characteristics and early clinical outcomes.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- Critical Assessment of Evidence Quality of Meta-Analyses Comparing Sacral 2 Alar-Iliac Fixation with Iliac Screws for Adult Spinal Deformity: An Umbrella Review with Emphasis on Methodological Limitations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study DesignNarrative Review.ObjectivePelvic fixation is a crucial technique in modern adult spinal deformity surgery, yet complications and failure rates remain high. Significant controversy exists regarding the type and number of points of pelvic fixation needed but remains poorly defined. The purpose of this article is to summarize current literature on pelvic fixation techniques, complications, and outcomes, discuss controversies, and suggest future directions.MethodsA literature search was conducted in PubMed for publications written in English with full text available from January 2000 to January 2022 using the following search terms: "spinopelvic fixation", "sacroiliac fixation", "iliac screw", "S2AI screw" and "complications" or "outcomes" together with "adult spinal deformity" and "scoliosis".ResultsTwenty-two articles were identified as describing complications/outcomes comparing pelvic fixation techniques (S2AI vs iliac; n = 6) or as reporting on a single technique (n = 16). The main categories of pelvic fixation complications were mechanical, pseudarthrosis, wound infection, sacroiliac joint pain, and revision. Four studies found lower complication rates for S2AI screws vs iliac screws. Descriptive studies reported high rates of complications for both S2AI and iliac screws. The frequency of complications was as follows: screw fracture 1.9%-9%, screw loosening 2%-65%, L5-S1 pseudarthrosis 6%-23.9%, sacroiliac joint pain 3.2%-52.5%, revision rate 2.4%-50%.ConclusionsPelvic fixation with either S2AI or iliac screws provides significant stability to constructs that extend to the sacrum. Further study is needed to characterize the number of points of pelvic fixation needed and clarify the role of pelvic fixation in causation or treatment of sacroiliac joint pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.